And the winners are . . .
57th Annual GRAMMY Awards
Award Genre: Jazz
31. Best Improvised Jazz Solo
The Eye Of The Hurricane
Kenny Barron, soloist
Track from: Gerry Gibbs Thrasher Dream Trio (Gerry Gibbs Thrasher Dream Trio)
Label: Whaling City Sound
Fingerprints WINNER
Chick Corea, soloist
Track from: Trilogy (Chick Corea Trio)
Label: Concord Jazz
You & The Night & The Music
Fred Hersch, soloist
Track from: Floating (Fred Hersch Trio)
Label: Palmetto Records
Recorda Me
Joe Lovano, soloist
Track from: The Latin Side Of Joe Henderson (Conrad Herwig Featuring Joe Lovano)
Label: Half Note
Sleeping Giant
Brad Mehldau, soloist
Track from: Mehliana: Taming The Dragon (Brad Mehldau & Mark Guiliana)
Label: Nonesuch
32. Best Jazz Vocal Album
Map To The Treasure: Reimagining Laura Nyro
(Billy Childs &) Various Artists
Label: Masterworks
I Wanna Be Evil
René Marie
Label: Motema Music
Live In NYC
Gretchen Parlato
Label: Obliqsound
Beautiful Life WINNER
Dianne Reeves
Label: Concord Records
Paris Sessions
Tierney Sutton
Label: BFM Jazz
33. Best Jazz Instrumental Album
Landmarks
Brian Blade & The Fellowship Band
Label: Blue Note Records
Trilogy WINNER
Chick Corea Trio
Label: Concord Jazz
Floating
Fred Hersch Trio
Label: Palmetto Records
Enjoy The View
Bobby Hutcherson, David Sanborn, Joey DeFrancesco Featuring Billy Hart
Label: Blue Note Records
All Rise: A Joyful Elegy For Fats Waller
Jason Moran
Label: Blue Note Records
34. Best Large Jazz Ensemble Album
The L.A. Treasures Project
The Clayton-Hamilton Jazz Orchestra
Label: Capri Records, Ltd.
Life In The Bubble WINNER
Gordon Goodwin's Big Phat Band
Label: Telarc International
Quiet Pride: The Elizabeth Catlett Project
Rufus Reid
Label: Motema Music
Live: I Hear The Sound
Archie Shepp Attica Blues Orchestra
Label: ArchieBall
OverTime: Music Of Bob Brookmeyer
The Vanguard Jazz Orchestra
Label: Planet Arts Recordings
35. Best Latin Jazz Album
The Latin Side Of Joe Henderson
Conrad Herwig Featuring Joe Lovano
Label: Half Note
The Pedrito Martinez Group
The Pedrito Martinez Group
Label: Motema Music
The Offense Of The Drum WINNER
Arturo O'Farrill & The Afro Latin Jazz Orchestra
Label: Motema
Second Half
Emilio Solla Y La Inestable De Brooklyn
Label: Emilio Solla Music
New Throned King
Yosvany Terry
Label: 5Passion
http://www.grammy.com/nominees?genre=16
Grammy Nominations/Awards — Jazz
Re: Grammy Nominations/Awards — Jazz
Arturo O'Farrill & ALJO - Offense Of The Drum - Winner
I tolja it was a lock!!;) Tellyawhat, it shoulda won best large ensemble also as it's infinitely better than Gordon Goodwin's Phat Band record (which I also own and like)!
I tolja it was a lock!!;) Tellyawhat, it shoulda won best large ensemble also as it's infinitely better than Gordon Goodwin's Phat Band record (which I also own and like)!
-
bluenoter
- Concierge
- Posts: 1514
- Joined: July 1st, 2013, 1:37 am
- Location: DC (Taxation Without Representation)
Re: Grammy Nominations/Awards — Jazz
the JazzTimes article
Here are the nominees for the 58th annual awards—the winners will be announced in February 2016:
Re: Grammy Nominations/Awards — Jazz
This years Latin Jazz nominations are typically bogus in that especially endearing Grammy kinda way! As low-visibility as Latin Jazz is, it still seems like the nominations are the typically usual subjects. Such a shame that so much great music gets overlooked due to what I can only assume is lack of knowledge that it exists! Here's my 5 picks:
Leo Gandelman - Velhas Ideias Novas
Ralph Irizarry & Timbalaye - 20th Anniversary
Humberto Ramirez & Oscar Cataya - Lifelong Friends
Sammy Figueroa - Imaginary World
Dafnis Prieto - Triangles & Circles (For the win!!!)
Honorable mention - Doug Beavers - Titanes Del Trombon - This record will probably get completely overlooked due to it being 1/2 Salsa (w/vocals) and 1/2 instumental. It's a shame 'cause this one's a straight up monsta!!!
I own 3 outta 5 of the ones that were nominated, they're good but....
Leo Gandelman - Velhas Ideias Novas
Ralph Irizarry & Timbalaye - 20th Anniversary
Humberto Ramirez & Oscar Cataya - Lifelong Friends
Sammy Figueroa - Imaginary World
Dafnis Prieto - Triangles & Circles (For the win!!!)
Honorable mention - Doug Beavers - Titanes Del Trombon - This record will probably get completely overlooked due to it being 1/2 Salsa (w/vocals) and 1/2 instumental. It's a shame 'cause this one's a straight up monsta!!!
I own 3 outta 5 of the ones that were nominated, they're good but....
-
hornplayer
- Founding Member
- Posts: 249
- Joined: June 30th, 2013, 7:48 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Contact:
Re: Grammy Nominations/Awards — Jazz
Joey Alexander is a very talented little boy, but I find it really hard to believe that his solo was REALLY one of the five best this past year - in anyone's opinion other than his mother's. In fact, imho, I KNOW it wasn't. Nor was his album special other than that it was by an 11-year-old child. Pretty nauseating :p especially when there were quite a number of good-to-great projects this year... Thinking especially of Robin Eubanks'.
-
bluenoter
- Concierge
- Posts: 1514
- Joined: July 1st, 2013, 1:37 am
- Location: DC (Taxation Without Representation)
Re: Grammy Nominations/Awards — Jazz
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/08/arts/music/grammys-tend-to-focus-on-heroics-in-singling-out-the-jazz-solo.html
A friend who edits a monthly jazz magazine tells me that nearly 5,000 new jazz records were sent in his direction last year. That’s not all of the new jazz albums made around the world in 2015, but a decent percentage of them.
So on those records might be 70,000 jazz solos — presuming, let’s say, an average of seven tracks per album (because jazz tracks can be long) and an average of two musical events per track that could be called solos (because jazz solos can be short or long or anything in between). Jazz solos can even be hard to discern as solos. In certain situations, and not infrequently, everyone in a jazz group is essentially soloing nearly all the time, which makes it hard, and possibly against the spirit of the thing, to draw a circle around a single solo.
There are five Grammy Awards in the category of jazz. One of them, best improvised jazz solo, is for improvising, and it rewards a single musician’s solo on a single track. (It’s been that way since 1991; previously it had honored a soloist’s performance across a whole album.) Philosophically, that seems good: As long as you’re going to reward a particular song, this award acknowledges that improvising is as important as composing to the identity of the song. But it’s a strange award, too. It asks more questions than it answers. Here’s the first one: 70,000 solos, in theory — where should the process of rewarding the best one start?
Practically, it starts with individual record labels submitting solos to a screening committee — sometimes more than one on a single album — with the approval of the artists, creating a long list. This year’s nominees for jazz solo of the year are: Joey Alexander, the unusually advanced 12-year-old pianist, on John Coltrane’s “Giant Steps,” from his album “My Favorite Things” (he recorded the solo when he was 11); Christian McBride, the bassist, with his trio, on a live version of the standard “Cherokee” — another trial for soloists — from his album “Live at the Village Vanguard”; John Scofield, the guitarist, on the song “Past Present,” from his album of the same name; the tenor saxophonist Donny McCaslin, on “Arbiters of Evolution,” by the Maria Schneider Orchestra; and the tenor saxophonist Joshua Redman, playing with the Bad Plus, on “Friend or Foe,” from the album “The Bad Plus Joshua Redman.”
That’s a very good list, less reliant on old favorites than usual. (There is a small number of jazz musicians who have repeatedly been given jazz Grammys: Chick Corea, Herbie Hancock, Wayne Shorter, Pat Metheny, Chucho Valdés. There’s your cynical answer to the question of what makes a solo worthy of a Grammy: if a musician familiar to a significant portion of Grammy voters has played it.) What do those five solos have in common, if anything? What seems to make one solo more Grammyish than another?
Mr. Alexander’s runs through a piece that is almost the exclusive property of young musicians with something to prove, because it is generally to be played fast, and serves up a new chord on every other beat. His entire 10-minute performance is basically a solo, with and without the rhythm section, which appears and disappears and appears again. Mr. McBride’s is a feat of fluency and technique, similarly expansive: improvisation on rapid chord changes at a fast tempo — around 180 beats per minute — running as a thread through much of the song, interrupted by short piano or drum solos.
Mr. Redman’s, at three and a half minutes, is an unrolling story that begins after the song’s marked-off halfway point. Mr. McCaslin’s five-minute solo achieves its full emotional roar inside an extraordinary Maria Schneider large-ensemble composition, moving through a series of vivid, changing backdrops. Mr. Scofield’s is masterfully played, full of original touch and vigor and roughness, on a clever but fairly straightforward, blues-related tune; it’s about a minute and a half, and the only one that doesn’t say, “Stand back: This is going to be extraordinary.”
What’s the pattern here? A Grammyish solo, by and large, is a framed event, a bravura spot-lit performance, a physical display, an act of heroism. There is a tradition of the heroic, thorough and teachable statement in jazz, including Coleman Hawkins’s “Body and Soul,” in 1939; Charlie Parker’s “Koko” (1945); Sonny Rollins’s “Blue 7” (1956); and Eric Dolphy’s solo on “Stormy Weather” with Charles Mingus’s group (1961). They all seem to carry the excited spirit of the earliest days of recording: Here’s an individual performance worth the medium.
But you could probably see 10 excellent jazz gigs in a row in New York this week without necessarily encountering a jazz solo that would be an obvious contender for a Grammy, and not feel disappointed. I hear a lot of bands these days — David Virelles’s, Aaron Goldberg’s, Kamasi Washington’s, Kris Davis’s, Jim Black’s — that use solos in either shorter or less monolithic ways, or at least not in ways that say this one’s the keeper. There might be many solos within a song, perhaps going on simultaneously, or one by one in a limited spot against one or more improvisers, or as way stations to something else rather than the final word, or they are to be understood as chunks in a continuing discourse. The heroic stand-alone solo is an interesting lens for how jazz is popularly understood, but not necessarily how it is practiced.
Jazz is about context and collaboration; it really is about bands. (For that reason, it’s a good thing that most of the solos in this year’s crop come from records made by working bands.) If the way you listen to jazz is to wait for the sustained passage of individual heroism, you may be missing a lot.
There is often, in jazz, a kind of philosophical insistence on inclusion and integration: a song is about A and B and C, rarely about just A. The solos that the Grammy voters are drawn to tend to be about A: They’re great-man theories. (Literally: The last time a woman won a jazz Grammy Award with “solo” in the name was Ella Fitzgerald in 1959, for “best jazz performance — soloist.”)
You do hear great improvising in jazz, all the time, but it’s generally part of a much greater whole. There could be a jazz Grammy for accompanying a solo, or for fluctuation in a rhythm section. There could even be one for the well-timed silence. I’m pretty sure I’m not kidding.
A friend who edits a monthly jazz magazine tells me that nearly 5,000 new jazz records were sent in his direction last year. That’s not all of the new jazz albums made around the world in 2015, but a decent percentage of them.
So on those records might be 70,000 jazz solos — presuming, let’s say, an average of seven tracks per album (because jazz tracks can be long) and an average of two musical events per track that could be called solos (because jazz solos can be short or long or anything in between). Jazz solos can even be hard to discern as solos. In certain situations, and not infrequently, everyone in a jazz group is essentially soloing nearly all the time, which makes it hard, and possibly against the spirit of the thing, to draw a circle around a single solo.
There are five Grammy Awards in the category of jazz. One of them, best improvised jazz solo, is for improvising, and it rewards a single musician’s solo on a single track. (It’s been that way since 1991; previously it had honored a soloist’s performance across a whole album.) Philosophically, that seems good: As long as you’re going to reward a particular song, this award acknowledges that improvising is as important as composing to the identity of the song. But it’s a strange award, too. It asks more questions than it answers. Here’s the first one: 70,000 solos, in theory — where should the process of rewarding the best one start?
Practically, it starts with individual record labels submitting solos to a screening committee — sometimes more than one on a single album — with the approval of the artists, creating a long list. This year’s nominees for jazz solo of the year are: Joey Alexander, the unusually advanced 12-year-old pianist, on John Coltrane’s “Giant Steps,” from his album “My Favorite Things” (he recorded the solo when he was 11); Christian McBride, the bassist, with his trio, on a live version of the standard “Cherokee” — another trial for soloists — from his album “Live at the Village Vanguard”; John Scofield, the guitarist, on the song “Past Present,” from his album of the same name; the tenor saxophonist Donny McCaslin, on “Arbiters of Evolution,” by the Maria Schneider Orchestra; and the tenor saxophonist Joshua Redman, playing with the Bad Plus, on “Friend or Foe,” from the album “The Bad Plus Joshua Redman.”
That’s a very good list, less reliant on old favorites than usual. (There is a small number of jazz musicians who have repeatedly been given jazz Grammys: Chick Corea, Herbie Hancock, Wayne Shorter, Pat Metheny, Chucho Valdés. There’s your cynical answer to the question of what makes a solo worthy of a Grammy: if a musician familiar to a significant portion of Grammy voters has played it.) What do those five solos have in common, if anything? What seems to make one solo more Grammyish than another?
Mr. Alexander’s runs through a piece that is almost the exclusive property of young musicians with something to prove, because it is generally to be played fast, and serves up a new chord on every other beat. His entire 10-minute performance is basically a solo, with and without the rhythm section, which appears and disappears and appears again. Mr. McBride’s is a feat of fluency and technique, similarly expansive: improvisation on rapid chord changes at a fast tempo — around 180 beats per minute — running as a thread through much of the song, interrupted by short piano or drum solos.
Mr. Redman’s, at three and a half minutes, is an unrolling story that begins after the song’s marked-off halfway point. Mr. McCaslin’s five-minute solo achieves its full emotional roar inside an extraordinary Maria Schneider large-ensemble composition, moving through a series of vivid, changing backdrops. Mr. Scofield’s is masterfully played, full of original touch and vigor and roughness, on a clever but fairly straightforward, blues-related tune; it’s about a minute and a half, and the only one that doesn’t say, “Stand back: This is going to be extraordinary.”
What’s the pattern here? A Grammyish solo, by and large, is a framed event, a bravura spot-lit performance, a physical display, an act of heroism. There is a tradition of the heroic, thorough and teachable statement in jazz, including Coleman Hawkins’s “Body and Soul,” in 1939; Charlie Parker’s “Koko” (1945); Sonny Rollins’s “Blue 7” (1956); and Eric Dolphy’s solo on “Stormy Weather” with Charles Mingus’s group (1961). They all seem to carry the excited spirit of the earliest days of recording: Here’s an individual performance worth the medium.
But you could probably see 10 excellent jazz gigs in a row in New York this week without necessarily encountering a jazz solo that would be an obvious contender for a Grammy, and not feel disappointed. I hear a lot of bands these days — David Virelles’s, Aaron Goldberg’s, Kamasi Washington’s, Kris Davis’s, Jim Black’s — that use solos in either shorter or less monolithic ways, or at least not in ways that say this one’s the keeper. There might be many solos within a song, perhaps going on simultaneously, or one by one in a limited spot against one or more improvisers, or as way stations to something else rather than the final word, or they are to be understood as chunks in a continuing discourse. The heroic stand-alone solo is an interesting lens for how jazz is popularly understood, but not necessarily how it is practiced.
Jazz is about context and collaboration; it really is about bands. (For that reason, it’s a good thing that most of the solos in this year’s crop come from records made by working bands.) If the way you listen to jazz is to wait for the sustained passage of individual heroism, you may be missing a lot.
There is often, in jazz, a kind of philosophical insistence on inclusion and integration: a song is about A and B and C, rarely about just A. The solos that the Grammy voters are drawn to tend to be about A: They’re great-man theories. (Literally: The last time a woman won a jazz Grammy Award with “solo” in the name was Ella Fitzgerald in 1959, for “best jazz performance — soloist.”)
You do hear great improvising in jazz, all the time, but it’s generally part of a much greater whole. There could be a jazz Grammy for accompanying a solo, or for fluctuation in a rhythm section. There could even be one for the well-timed silence. I’m pretty sure I’m not kidding.
-
bluenoter
- Concierge
- Posts: 1514
- Joined: July 1st, 2013, 1:37 am
- Location: DC (Taxation Without Representation)
Re: Grammy Nominations/Awards — Jazz
Better late than never—
On this copy of the nominations list that I'd posted on Dec. 8, 2015 (whose source was this article in JazzTimes), I've indicated the winners.
For more information about who won this year, please visit this 58th Annual Grammy Awards page and choose categories from the "Display By Award Genre" menu.
Re: Grammy Nominations/Awards — Jazz
Gracias.
-
bluenoter
- Concierge
- Posts: 1514
- Joined: July 1st, 2013, 1:37 am
- Location: DC (Taxation Without Representation)
Re: Grammy Nominations/Awards — Jazz
Jazzooo wrote:Gracias.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests